Gas_Eyes
All-Star Author
Dallas
Posts:859
Points:291,060
Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 6, 2012 1:58:19 PM
In one report EPA said that there was never any contamination from fracking. Now this. EPA needs to come clean on this issue or they will look stupid and inept.
|
GT3186
Champion Author
Salem
Posts:1,255
Points:267,005
Joined:Aug 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 5, 2012 10:05:49 PM
I don't trust the EPA any further than I can spit; and I can't spit very far.
|
Ahking
Champion Author
Orange County
Posts:1,991
Points:326,175
Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 5, 2012 7:35:13 PM
Don't be so hasty. Let's see how it plays out.
|
ktbaeohana
Champion Author
Las Vegas
Posts:1,158
Points:261,020
Joined:Mar 2010
|
Message Posted: Feb 5, 2012 2:07:24 PM
EPA need to get it right.
|
aquarinut
Champion Author
British Columbia
Posts:1,196
Points:274,960
Joined:Jul 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 5, 2012 11:37:13 AM
Seems the EPA has no continuity on its testing making it hard to almost impossible to believe as credible.
But hey its the EPA....
|
leraar2
Champion Author
Massachusetts
Posts:1,940
Points:427,820
Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 5, 2012 10:41:00 AM
the oil companies would love to be able to say that
YOU'RE ONLY IMAGINING THINGS.
|
dgerst
Champion Author
South Carolina
Posts:1,020
Points:220,555
Joined:Aug 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 5, 2012 9:48:32 AM
If the ground water exhibited chemicals that it didn't before the fracking too place, then it's caused by fracking.
|
Fuggheddabowdit
Veteran Author
Phoenix
Posts:304
Points:47,620
Joined:Jul 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 5, 2012 3:52:57 AM
LESS Smoke And Mirrors . . . LESS Government . . . LESS Spending . . . LESS Fear-Mongering . . . MORE Jobs . . .
|
SBlouch
Champion Author
San Antonio
Posts:7,341
Points:1,561,555
Joined:Apr 2007
|
Message Posted: Feb 5, 2012 3:16:06 AM
Well, if the EPA would be right more often, we might then believe them. But as we know the EPA has gotten it wrong more than getting it right.
|
Vetteblu
Champion Author
Denver
Posts:1,637
Points:465,865
Joined:Oct 2010
|
Message Posted: Feb 5, 2012 2:21:51 AM
Standby for more earthquakes via fracking.
|
JohnofGB
Champion Author
Flint
Posts:3,597
Points:734,120
Joined:Feb 2010
|
Message Posted: Feb 5, 2012 1:33:45 AM
Is this the treehuggers , again? I have not seen anything like this report on any real news source.
|
1momsunshine
Champion Author
Ottawa
Posts:3,631
Points:642,870
Joined:Mar 2010
|
Message Posted: Feb 5, 2012 12:33:36 AM
wow
|
nurdco
Champion Author
Colorado Springs
Posts:7,216
Points:1,330,310
Joined:Apr 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 5, 2012 12:10:43 AM
HONEST EPA???
|
amerk73
Champion Author
Dallas
Posts:5,210
Points:1,256,880
Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 4, 2012 11:45:12 PM
WOW
|
StArrow68
Champion Author
Oakland
Posts:1,416
Points:1,000,780
Joined:Apr 2003
|
Message Posted: Feb 4, 2012 10:27:05 PM
The problem is that most have no confidence in the Fed's to get it right.
Whatever the conclusion it will be disputed until somebody can provide
proof of their claims for good or ill.
|
graceman
Champion Author
Baltimore
Posts:3,736
Points:914,795
Joined:Jun 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 4, 2012 10:23:05 PM
Big business always rules over peoples health.
|
playtimeCLE
Champion Author
Cleveland
Posts:6,455
Points:1,182,600
Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 4, 2012 10:00:06 PM
They note geology and hydrology differ from state to state and within each state, and therefore, they say, a national one-size-fits-all regulatory structure would do more harm than good.
This is probably the most true statement in the entire article. I think the federal government needs to step aside & let local specialists make decisions for their local areas. If fracking doesn't cause problems in one place then go to town. But if it is causing problems in another area then they need to take another look at that area, not every area.
[Edited by: playtimeCLE at 2/4/2012 10:01:53 PM EST]
|
aquarinut
Champion Author
British Columbia
Posts:1,196
Points:274,960
Joined:Jul 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 4, 2012 10:00:00 PM
From article:......The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is fending off criticism after issuing a draft report claiming it has found chemicals consistent with hydraulic fracturing in groundwater in Wyoming. Non-EPA analysts have criticized the agency for exercising poor quality control of its water samples, overlooking that many activities other than hydraulic fracturing could be the source of the common chemicals reported by EPA, and ignoring evidence several water tests closer to hydraulic fracturing sites than EPA’s disputed samples reveal no chemical contamination.
From article:.....“EPA’s Wyoming water study is not really about water or public health. The agenda-driven conclusions are part of the Obama administration’s unscientific anti-fossil fuel campaign,”
Time to get rid of the EPA.... lots of tax money spent on nothing but justifying jobs because of greenie interjections!!!
|
drpepperTX
Champion Author
Texas
Posts:4,906
Points:391,320
Joined:Apr 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 4, 2012 9:50:33 PM
From the article- “If the current administration can ban the use of fracking for oil and gas extraction, they will deliver a near-fatal blow to the domestic energy boom sweeping across those areas of the country where shale gas and oil are abundant,” said Noon. “The shale revolution has been made possible by geology and advances in technology, especially hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling. As a result, natural gas prices in the United States are falling, threatening the viability of taxpayer-subsidized wind and solar power.”
And that folks is the truth behind the hyperbole, insinuation and outright lies thrown out from the anti fossil fuel crowd. And this all stems from the global warming hoax.
|
amoshins
All-Star Author
Trenton
Posts:947
Points:309,080
Joined:Apr 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 4, 2012 9:26:07 PM
TOugh stuff
|